3 Contestants, a bit lame to have had so little engagement, but that is a first, and the submissions were interesting, and some went over the top in terms of improvement of their original submission @tayOthman

A check that is both simple and smart. @andreasd811 you earned it. And I liked the fact this could scale eventually or become its own tool 👏 Andreas decided not to redeem its prize to give it to support pyrevit 

I changed a bit this category because… I can ;p @KSalmon you earned it! The check makes sense, and while its complexity is average, it has interesting ideas in it. It would require some love, but this is a good first one

A complete check that pushes the boundaries of quality control. @andreasd811 you earned it for its potential. I see the tool as an interesting validation tool.  👏  Andreas decided not to redeem its prize to give it to support pyrevit 

Simple, elegant, advanced, and maybe even smarter than the others—this entry might include a library that makes the check more reusable. Code improvements to the Preflight Checks Tools are also welcome. @tayOthman the tool is interesting and your involvement was outstanding! Good job 🚀

Thanks for your engagement!

@sanzoghenzo you bring so much to the project with your knack and expert eyes for code quality/etiquette! Thank you man 🪂 @dosymep you are not bad too 😜